‘Dateline NBC’ Sting Raises Questions About Online-Solicitation-of-a-Minor Law

But spokeswoman says TV show does not anticipate changing its reports in wake of assistant DA’s suicide

When police officers knocked on the door of the Terrell, Texas, home of Louis W. “Bill” Conradt Jr. to serve him with warrants in connection with an online-solicitation-of-a-minor case, the experienced prosecutor didn’t answer.

After working for more than two decades enforcing the Texas Penal Code, Conradt likely knew that the law that had brought the officers to his door was one of the strongest of its kind in the nation — a statute that would eliminate any defense he could offer in a courtroom.

With a “Dateline NBC” camera crew outside Conradt’s house, police entered the premises on Nov. 5. That’s when Conradt used a gun to kill himself, according to Murphy, Texas, Police Department Sgt. Snow Robertson.

Robertson alleges Conradt, a 56-year-old Rockwall County assistant district attorney who previously had served as Kaufman County’s elected DA, had exchanged sexual electronic messages with a person he believed to be a 13-year-old boy. The boy was actually an adult posing as a child. The adult worked with Perverted Justice, an organization that has gained national attention recently for outing adults who allegedly engage in sexual conversations in Internet chat rooms with people they believe are children.

Perverted Justice members pose as kids in chat rooms and wait to be contacted by adults. Often after adults attempt to set up meetings to engage in sex with people they believe are children, the group names the individuals on its Web site, notifying the adults’ employers and family members.

More recently, Perverted Justice has worked with “Dateline” on the televised series “To Catch a Predator.” The program shows adults who arrive at pre-arranged locations believing they are about to have sex with a child. “Dateline NBC” also works with police officers who arrest the targets on camera after a “Dateline” reporter interviews the adults. “Dateline,” Perverted Justice and the police recently completed a sting operation in Murphy.

Robertson says Conradt did not go to the prearranged location, which was a house in Murphy.

He says the police were attempting to deliver a search warrant and an arrest warrant on Conradt when he shot himself.

Robertson says at least 23 individuals from around Texas were arrested in the Murphy sting.

Williamson County, Texas, District Attorney John Bradley did not know Conradt, but he says a state law that went into effect on Sept. 1, 2005, makes felony convictions against defendants who solicit children online almost a certainty.

“Any prosecutor would know not only that the law makes it much easier to prosecute these cases but eliminates many of the defenses,” says Bradley, who has taught a class for state prosecutors on how to try online predator cases.

According to the online-solicitation-of-a-minor law, §33.021 of the Texas Penal Code, it is a second-degree felony to communicate in a sexually explicit manner with a person the actor believes to be under the age of 14. The law also eliminates most of the common defenses to online-solicitation-of-a-minor charges, including that no meeting ever took place between the adult and child; that the actor did not intend for a meeting to take place; or that the actor was engaged in a fantasy at the time of the offense.

The law is one of the only Texas felonies that doesn’t require the state to prove that the defendant committed an “overt act” — that the person made a move to commit a crime, says Phillip Robertson, a Dallas criminal defense attorney who has represented people accused of online sexual crimes. The law goes too far in that it criminalizes the thoughts people have, he says.

“It just guts any defense that you have if you were just role playing. It really allows the police to come and testify about what your intentions were when you know what your intentions were,” Robertson says. “I think you need to have an overt act.”

But Fred Moss, a criminal law professor at Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law, disagrees with Robertson. The act of typing on a computer keyboard is the overt act, he says. The online-solicitation-of-a-minor law is preventative in nature, he adds.

“This is just another example of how the law is pushing back to allow law enforcement to jump in and prevent a crime from occurring,” Moss says.

But combine that tough law with an unusual sting operation, and it should give prosecutors cause for concern, Bradley says.

“Here was two outside entities — one is Perverted Justice and the other is “Dateline.” And each of those entities has different missions and objectives than law enforcement,” Bradley says. “And they certainly have done a great deal toward assisting and prosecuting these investigations. But it may be time to look at the ethical and legal guidelines to make sure their involvement is not inappropriately influencing these investigations.”

Prosecutors are limited in what they can say or release about criminal investigations to ensure the integrity of their cases — limitations that do not apply to the press or groups such as Perverted Justice, Bradley says.

“I don’t know what impact their involvement had on this guy’s suicide. … I’m not trying to defend what he did or say what his punishment should have been. The circumstances ought to cause people to pause and think about how we structure these things.”

OVERT ACTS

Collin County District Attorney John Roach says his office will evaluate the evidence collected by the Murphy Police Department and present it to a grand jury for possible indictment of the individuals who were arrested in the sting.

Since the law only requires solicitation, “it’s just a question of establishing the idea that these were the persons on the computers,” Roach says.

Roach says the Murphy Police Department notified his office about a week ago about the sting, but the DA’s office was not involved in it. He says it remains to be seen if the presence of the television cameras will have an impact on possible prosecutions.

“Our position is this about these kinds of things: We are in the law enforcement business, not show business,” Roach says.

In a written statement, “Dateline NBC” says there was no contact between Conradt and the television program at any point in the Murphy sting. “Dateline NBC” spokeswoman Jenny Tartikoff says a date has not been set to broadcast the Murphy sting. “Dateline” does not anticipate changing how it reports stings in the wake of Conradt’s death, she says.

Many of the individuals arrested in the sting were taken into custody when they went to a house in Murphy, presumably to meet the youth they had been chatting with on the Internet, Robertson says.

Conradt did not go to the house, Robertson says. He says a “Dateline” crew was outside Conradt’s house on Nov. 5 while police were attempting to serve him with the warrants.

Conradt’s boss, Rockwall County Criminal District Attorney Galen Ray Sumrow, says the arrest could have been handled more appropriately.

“This guy comes to work every morning at about 7:30. They could have arrested him in the parking lot,” Sumrow says. “I question the methodology they used. The question that comes to mind: Were they really doing it for law enforcement purposes, or were they doing it for reality TV?”

A representative from Perverted Justice, who responded in writing to e-mail questions, says this is the first time a case — in the hundreds of cases the group has been involved in — resulted in a suicide as police attempted to serve an arrest warrant.

“I don’t think our role in this had anything to do with Conradt’s decision — he chose to solicit a child, and he chose to end his life,” says Xavier Von Erck, director of operations for Perverted Justice. “We just find it disappointing that he will now not be convicted in a court of law to serve time.”

Von Erck says that no investigation the organization has been involved with has had a negative impact on a criminal prosecution.

“No prosecutor that has worked with us has gone away unpleased. No law enforcement that has worked with us have gone away unpleased. Law enforcement that works with us knows what we’re about, which is specialized investigations into this sort of crime,” Von Erck says.

“Everything we do prior to arrest is shown and poured over by law enforcement,” Von Erck says. “If they don’t like the evidence we gather, the individual isn’t … arrested.”

Houston’s Steven Rocket Rosen is another criminal defense attorney who has big problems with the Texas online-solicitation-of-a-minor law. Rosen argues that the 14-month-old law infringes on an individual’s First Amendment rights in his own home.

“It’s truly, truly unconstitutional. It’s an invasion of our First Amendment rights. What I fear are juries failing to understand our greatest rights in the world,” he says.

In Rosen’s view, there should be a legal difference between fantasy and the “real intent” to engage in solicitation of a minor. But the online-solicitation-of-a-minor law doesn’t recognize that.

Rosen, of the Law Offices of Steven Rocket Rosen, says he is defending three individuals, one in Fort Bend County and two in Harris County, from online-solicitation-of-a-minor charges. One of his clients may spurn a plea bargain and go to trial, potentially providing Rosen with an opportunity to fight the untested law in an appellate court. However, beyond the constitutional issue, Rosen concedes the law provides little means of defense.

“The worst part of this whole thing — obviously being convicted of a felony is bad — but when you become a registered sex offender for the rest of your life, if you have a family and you have children, what a disservice,” Rosen says. “You can’t take your kids to the zoo. You can’t have your kids’ friends come over.”

BELIEFS

Sumrow, the Rockwall County DA, says he and everyone in his office is numb about the news of Conradt’s death and what led up to it.

“If the allegations are true, we are certainly blindsided by it,” says Sumrow, the Rockwall County DA for 21 years.

Sumrow says Conradt, who worked for him as chief felony prosecutor since 2004, was a fair but vigorous prosecutor. “He certainly believed in what he did,” says Sumrow.

Conradt was the DA in Kaufman County for 22 years, until he mounted an unsuccessful run for district judge in 2002.

Taryn Davis, who worked in the Kaufman County DA’s office from 1995 until 2000, says she’s “absolutely stunned” about the circumstances of the death of a man she admired.

“He was a good guy, and obviously I don’t know I can tell you that with these allegations looming over his death,” Davis says. “He was a brilliant man. I don’t know. I don’t believe the allegations, first of all. I don’t believe he would ever harm anyone.”

Davis, a solo practitioner in Kaufman, says she wishes he had reached out to friends for help.

She says, “He did so many good things as a prosecutor and as a person, and the bad part about all of this is I’m afraid he will be known for that last day and not the rest.”

15 Responses to “‘Dateline NBC’ Sting Raises Questions About Online-Solicitation-of-a-Minor Law”

  1. hope Says:

    This is the most cruel and unjust law ever passed. I feel if the good people in Texas really knew how this sting operation was set up they would be furious. Anyone with a heart would have been caught in the deceitful trap. I pray everyday God will open up the eyes of our justice
    system and stop ruining innocent peoples lives.

  2. Lisa Says:

    and I hope the predators and pedophiles running free around this planet are stopped before another child is hurt. If these people were so innocent, why are they trying to meet children for sex?

  3. wynjean walden Says:

    According to recent stats 1in 5 children are accosted on the internet by predetors however 1 in 3 children are abused by their own family members. Recent stats also show us that in Dallas County 210,000 crimes were committed last year but only 20,000 people were incarcerated can’t we use the police out on the streets rather than in side an office role-playing as 14/15 year olds.

  4. hope Says:

    All we are hearing is what Dateline has air on their show. If people really knew how unfair the physiological tactics used to trap some of these people you may understand what I am saying. They post an online suicidal decoy pretending to be underage that uses very sophisticated words to play on a person sympathy. The decoy actually begs these people to be his friend because he pretends he doesn’t have any friends, his parents hate him and he gets beat up at school. How fair is this? Anyone with a heart or lonely could easily have fallen for this kind of manipulation. They ruin these people lives because they are found guilty before they have a chance tell their real intent.

  5. Lisa Says:

    Hope, I believe I asked you before where you have gotten this information. If its true, and your sources are correct, then Id like to show that side of this story. However, I know a few of the PeeJ people and I have never heard this.
    Let me know where you are coming up with this information.
    thanks

  6. Tina Says:

    Hope wrote :” Anyone with a heart would have been caught in the deceitful trap. I pray everyday God will open up the eyes of our justice system and stop ruining innocent peoples lives.”

    These individuals aren’t getting arrested for lending a sympathetic ear to troubled children . They’re getting arrested for soliciting sex and sending pornographic images to people they believe are minors . They show up to these encounters expecting to have sex with these kids , bringing items like condoms and alcohol .You call that having a heart ? Innocent ? They’ve ruined their own lives – and better them than an innocent child.

  7. Tammy Says:

    Men are scum. Wherever there is crime, war and misery, there is a man! When is our educational system going to realize it and give additional education to men on HUMANNESS? And more men need to be replaced by women in positions of power so we have more balance on society. It is sick how little concept men have of some form of ethics.

  8. Carl Campbell Says:

    We are jail happy USA. We are very dogmatic in our thinking about jail. I do not care “saving” real criminals from their due punishment. I just question our way of punishing these guys. When a politician stands up and says, I want to empty our jails of non-violent criminals and put ankle bracelets on them. Let them work and pay for the monitoring. Monitor their behavior (It is possible now, 2007) and send them to jail if they break the rules. The savings from not sending 1 criminal to jail for one year would put 1 student through 4 years of college. We don’t need to raise taxes for universal healthcare, just stop wasting money sending non-violent criminals to jail, use the 40 billion saved for that! Think of the money that we would save by not supporting their families (welfare) while they are in th joint! He will get elected.

  9. Sammie Lone Says:

    Tammy you have to be kidding about your claims on “men”. Yes, to an extent, it is true that crime and war, not so much misery, have been caused by the male population. But let’s not go overboard now. Although it might have been a societal flaw in the history of mankind to have placed man over woman for such a long time but times have changed.

    Also, what is up with the double standard going on? Please, the United States of America is one of the few countries in the world that gives equal opportunities to both men and women. Just because in the past men were placed in history into the dominant roles should not be a reason for you to complain that women are not placed into “positions of power”. Who is stopping the female population from getting into those positions? No longer can you say that women are being oppressed, whether physically or mentally, in the U.S. to obtain positions of power. Everyone, whether you are people of color or white, man or woman, must work to get into those positions. Not everyone is privileged to be born with a silver spoon or a network of connections with other “men” in positions of power.

    Please, don’t use a couple bad example of men to suddenly make claims that the whole male population is the same. Also, not only is the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Secretary of State both females, which by the way is 2nd and 4th in the line of succession to the U.S. presidency, but at this moment a woman senator is running to become the Democratic candidate for the 2008 U.S. Presidency.

    Although history has been written and is irreversible, you should also see hope in the fact that history is also being written right now. Luckily for all of us humans, both man and woman have the power to make this new history better than it was in the past. Unfortunately, such claims as yours, whether written with the emotions at the time or with personal experience, only puts history on hold. Basically, what better are you than the “men” in the past that have created the so-called “misery” to us all?

    P.S. Carl Campbell, I agree with you 100%. Honestly, if you are going to incriminate someone that has done a non-violent crime, isn’t it better to obtain parts of the criminal’s personal income, and put them into serious personal therapy? Make these non-violent criminals “work and pay for the monitoring”. I mean you are already incriminating them, why can’t the law force someone to work and pay to fix their own ill-advised behaviors? A clear solution will be placing these men into facilities, much like jail but very low cost compared to other detention facilities, that has no internet access and television shows that are only friendly into helping them fix their problems. Then during the daytime make them work building homes (like Habitat for Humanity for example) or whatever else that is useful to society, and they can goto serious therapy.

    Honestly, it sickens me because this crime is an illness that jail will probably not work in fixing. Heck, the idea of being embarrased on television doesn’t stop these individuals from chatting and coming to these decoy homes. I’m sure that this may help in stopping those who may have been severely confused from starting this behavior, but what is scary is not those people but those who are willing to do it no matter the consequence. That is who we should be after and I’m not sure if its working.

    Wasting money to put these men in jail like other felons is a huge waste of America’s resources. It seems like all these are working men so why not collaborate with the IRS, police department, and FBI to make sure a permanent solution is sought after. Make sure that the IRS seizes portions of their income to be used towards therapy, have the police department and FBI work to make a list of the predators, the danger they pose, etc. so that these men can not go into another city or state and think that their records will not follow them. Also, like said above, for the time being before their trials (the court can take a long time incriminating these folks), put these men in detention centers that is more suited like a rehab center than a jail. This is not a lot cheaper than placing these men into, I guess, minimum security facilities, but it will help in making sure that these men are being responsible for their own actions and that they don’t freely walk around to become potential threats to minors. The internet is the biggest problem in isolating these men but someone might be able to figure something out in the future on that matter.

  10. Sammie Lone Says:

    Also, even though these men have not done an actual crime per say through physical activities, I believe in prevention. What good are laws and law enforcement if only after the matter you take action. Sometimes, prevention is the best way. Of course this is America so we have to figure out a way to prevent while still protecting the rights of every citizen, but with cases like these, I’m sure as hell glad its not an actual minor being victimized by an adult.

    And on a last note, I hope that Homeland Security and the local and state law enforcements can be as successful in catching potential terrorists on U.S. soil as Dateline and local law enforcement are in catching predators. To me, that will be money really, really well spent.

  11. thememoryartist Says:

    Sammie ,
    Maybe Homeland Security and the local state and law enforcements could be as successful in catching potential terrorists on U.S. soil as Dateline has been in catching predators if Homeland Security and law enforcement officers weren’t some of the people getting caught in the Dateline stings . A Homeland Security officer can’t do anything to stop terrorism if he’s in jail for soliciting sex from a minor online. No one needs to spend any money to employ criminals like that to protect our country. The guys caught in these stings are “domestic terrorists” themselves .

    Sure , let them work to pay for their monitoring and treatment – but not while working for Homeland Security , not while working as a police officer , not while working as a junior high school teacher , not while working as a pediatrician ….but only after they’ve first been temporarily removed from society , evaluated , mandated into treatment , and assessed for risk of future criminal sexual activity.

    The costs to the health and the lives of children who are preyed upon and abused by men like these men lasts a lifetime . These costs are emotional , physical , social and can subsequently result in economic costs for society as well . Just one of these men can go after and destroy many lives , and many of these lives may be saved by getting just one of these predators off the street.

    Carl wrote :”I do not care “saving” real criminals from their due punishment.I just question our way of punishing these guys.”

    Well Carl , these guys are real criminals .They did what they did firmly believing that they were soliciting minors for sex , and they showed up expecting to carry out their plans . There is no reason to believe that they would not have gone through with the plans if they had been made with an actual minor . They all have claimed that this was “the first time” they’ve ever done anything like this. That’s doubtful. The only thing that stopped their intended crimes from happening is that there was no actual minor (this time). These particular crimes were non-violent , because they were prevented. We don’t know that there would not have been violence involved if they’d been able to get to an actual child. That said , physical violence is often the LEAST of the damage that is caused by rape and sexual abuse.

  12. Sammie Lone Says:

    The thing is, I am not knowledgeable of the law or the punishments that come with the respective laws, however I have a feeling, just a tiny hunch for some reason, that those indicted for soliciting sex with minors over the internet get a pretty light sentence relative to other felonies. Just a slight notion I have, but I don’t have facts so please don’t take my word for it.

    So basically, these men will be back on the streets in a matter of a few years at most probably, meaning they will be contributing citizens of the U.S. once again. I mean convicted felons get jobs after being released from jail so why not make these men pay for their own therapy as a penalty. I don’t mean trust them in getting their own therapists. No, we can use the therapists and pyschologists that already work for the U.S. government working with criminals. Like parole, if they do not commit to their scheduled visits with the therapist, then on violation of the parole, place them in jail once again. The thing is, I’m not an expert on sexual predators but it seems like one of those crimes that hard time can not fix. Similar to alcoholics going to AA meetings with the mindset of fixing their problems, these men need some coordinated and forced commitments to a similar treatment. I don’t know to what extent the government is responsible for making sure that these men do not commit these crimes again, but this seems like it will be more effective. Also, even though your forced to goto these therapy sessions, if they are paying for it, maybe they will take it more seriously then having the taxpayers get the full bill for it.

    Also, I know that Dateline along with numerous other media outlets have made attempts advising parents of the danger that the internet brings to their children, but I think more should be dedicated to that. I also know that congress in the past couple of months have been attempting to make laws about child protection. I am not sure if the laws have yet been written or passed or what the exact statutes of the laws are, but nonetheless congress is working at it. I also understand that in today’s society, life revolves around the computer and internet, even for children in elementary school sometimes. There are avenues such as myspace.com and online chatting programs like aim, yahoo, msn, etc. that many people of all ages are on communicating with the world around them. Call me old fashioned but it really baffles my mind when thinking that children (minors) under the age of 14 are using these programs to make friends and communicate with their friends. I mean, what happened to going over to your friends house to have a chat or a game of tag or basketball to make friends? Will minors be outcasted by their peers if they don’t have an online profile so people can become friends with them? Is that what is happening nowadays? Because honestly, I support young kids learning the power and tools of the computer and internet at an early age so that they will not be outdated by the time they get to highschool; technology is a huge part of education. However, I personally feel like children, especially children under the age of 14, do not belong on myspace or other chatting programs. It should not be necessary and parents should not allow it to go on in their homes in the first place.

    Yes, teach your children of the powerful tools on the computer like Microsoft Word (or any other document writing tool) to write up school assignments, developing both typing skills as well as professionalism at a young age.

    Yes, use the computer to install software that inspire children’s minds and games that stimulate their imagination and grow their knowledge base. I can’t name specific programs, but I am sure there are many out there nowadays for children to learn.

    Yes, teach children about the usefulness of the internet. It is a highway to a new techonological dimension that many adults take for granted. The internet is the main framework that is fueling the rapid growth of techonology all around the world and the growth of the economy in general. Teach children to use the internet to search for material and if possible teach them to learn how to figure out what sites are relevant to their research and what sites are irrelevant.

    No, do not let children at a young age get into computer games that wastes their time with numerous hours of gameplay with very little stimulation of the mind. Children should be outside (in a safe location) running around with their friends rather than sitting behind a monitor for hours.

    No, do not let your children roam the full spectrum of the internet. The internet is a society in itself and just like real society has good and bad things, the internet does so too. And it is very easy for children to get influenced by the bad because they do not have enough experience of dealing with reality in the first place. As a parent, especially for a child under 14, PLEASE USE PARENTAL CONTROLS. Even if your child begs you to get a myspace, place parental controls on it. As a matter of fact, if every friend in his class has a myspace or some other online community, make the account with your child so that you know the password and you know what type of information he/she is putting on the site. Periodically check his/her myspace, etc. to check if he/she is putting too much information on it and whether his/her friends are doing the same.

    Please parents, be responsible. The law enforcement can only go so far. It is the parents responsibility to at least put your child in the best possible scenario for safety. These predators should not have a population called minors to even talk to online in the first place. Of course, if your child is in high school, things may change. But at least until they are in high school, you must place restrictions on their computer use, so that your children can learn all the usefulness of a computer while also learning how to be safe using it. A side note, it may take time and you might have to learn how to use the computer yourself, but it is important that you work with your children and go through the ropes with them. Just putting restrictions are not enough. It is important you show them directly the safe ways of using the internet and also interact with them to make sure that nothing wrong is going on.

    If some or none of what I said is plausible, I am sure there are other ways to keep your children safe. Because the best prevention is not allowing these predators to even seek out your child. With the above steps and other more steps you follow to create a safe environment for your child, these online predators have no chance.

    My thing is that I feel like jail is just not enough to stop these men from committing the crime again. Actually, without some more measures such as making laws to make sure that these men are flagged for however many years after being released from jail and making sure that these men commit to going to therapy on a regular basis (by paying for it themselves I hope), I don’t think some of these men will stop this behavior.

    P.S. At times I do feel like some of these men are lead on by the decoys, whom by the way are adults with skills of playing on emotional weakness, etc., therefore some of these men might not commit the crime again. But I’m not foolish to think that most of these men didn’t have bad intent. They are absolutely disgusting people and they are criminals.

    I’m sorry if I placed this post in the wrong article or section of the website. I apologize for another long post as well.

  13. Sammie Lone Says:

    I am embarrassed about my first post on this page. I had no idea until now that this website is dedicated to survivors. I google searched for some newspaper articles on the dateline investigation to get a third party report on the events and happened to come to this page. Honestly, I first thought that this was a website that was dedicated in compiling articles from the web and having an avenue to discuss about it.

    I apologize if my comments made on my first post offended anyone. I had absolutely no intentions on offending anybody here, including Tammy. I thought in context of the article that Tammy’s comments about men were inappropriate. Now I see that my comments are inappropriate in context to this website. Tammy, I was not trying to belittle you or your claims made in your post. I didn’t understand where you were coming from so I made a response.

    Thanks for understanding.

  14. xuxppxxuxyyy Says:

    hello it is test. WinRAR provides the full RAR and ZIP file support, can decompress CAB, GZIP, ACE and other archive formats.

  15. John Says:

    This law is constructed to punish ANYONE in the most brutal ways. I can understand the need for a law like these, but the way they are designed is almost….well hell might as well give them the death penalty. I’ve been reading some reports of individuals who were charged with this offense. It’s sad some feel like have no “real” choices. Either go to prison, get fined. IF you make it through that. Then you’re branded for life a “Sex Offender”. Society doesn’t care what you did. Just that title alone means always watching your back. Might piss off some neighbor just because you live in the area. Can no longer raise your children, if any, the way you should be able to. I know men and women are stupid. We all make mistakes. It’s our ability to learn and not to repeat the same mistakes that should be taken into consideration. I’m not trying to make excuses for these people, but come on. This law seems worst then a terrorist law. If you really think about it. You have to be not in the right set of mind to be texting, chatting, or meeting up with a minor. Maybe it would first be better justice to have these people see a professional psychiatrist. Perhaps a good long probationary period. Maybe even a GPS monitor for some. I’m just expressing ideas. The legal system suppose to be for protecting, but also for rehabilitation. How are you going to help a person who commits this sort of offense when they basically have no way to defend themselves. No just means. Just Shut the hell up! You did it and now your life is over. BAMM! “Brand-SEX OFFENDER”. You might wonder why I’m bitter towards it. Well it’s because I personally know one. He is in his mid 20s. Smart individual with children of his own. All he did was text a young girl, whom he has known for some years and the two were friends. However, she was underage and her mother found the text messages on her phone. The words written were a bit graphic and the sexual conversation should never have taken place. In any case he tried to apologize for his misconduct, but the girl’s mother, which was also a friend of his, turned it in to the police. Months rolled by and a detective called him in for questioning. Now he is going out of his mind and falling into a great deal of depression because the detective did not charge him, but told him the charge would fall under “Online Solicitation of a Minor”. When he got home he said he looked it up and nearly collapsed at the charge and the punishments. i remember him breaking down and gasping for air. like someone knocked the life out of him. All he said was, “All that just because of a text”. I believe more if it was my daughter i would feel more disappointed in myself. I, like most friends, family and other people I’ve talked to feel sad and pitty for him. If you asked me do I think he should go free. Well, no. I just don’t believe all the punishment for simply a text message. Yea i am mad at him for not thinking, but he’s human isn’t he? When was the last time you did something wrong and got caught. For some maybe never. For others maybe you were harshly punished for a 1st time No-no. As for my friend, well if I had to put something on him for a Text Messaging offense. It would probably be a strict probation consisting of counseling, online monitoring, and maybe GPS tracking depending on severity. I don’t like what he did, but I do believe in second chances. After all, nothing took pace. PS had he went and did something with that girl, then yea. I’d be all for the sentencing, the “Brand” and all that shabang stuff.


Leave a Reply